|
For Immediate Release NEWS RELEASE Contact: GROUNDBREAKING
RESEARCH PROVIDES A "REPORT CARD" FOR URBAN AREAS' EMERGENCY EVACUATION CAPABILITY
New
Survey Ranks 37 Largest Urban Areas, Identifies Key Factors for Reviewing Readiness
Plans
(WASHINGTON, DC) October 12, 2006 - Today, the American Highway Users Alliance
announced a first-of-its-kind research study that provides a clear and understandable
rating system for planners, homeland security experts, and the public to use when
considering the evacuation challenges facing the nation's urban areas. The
Report, entitled "Emergency Evacuation Report Card 2006; 25 Urban Areas Could
Face Greater Challenges than New Orleans Experienced after Hurricane Katrina,"
evaluates the 37 largest urban areas in the country - those with more than 1,000,000
in population - to identify the evacuation challenges facing planners and residents
in each area. The evaluation index grades urban areas by reviewing internal traffic
flow, highway capacity of major exit routes, and automobile accessibility. The
research findings also include information on planning for the transit dependent.
In general, areas that scored higher have lower population densities, more substantial
evacuation routes, and do not have major geographical barriers obstructing evacuation
exits. Prior
to September 11, 2001, there was little or no recognized need to plan for emergency
evacuations in most urban areas. Since then, security, transportation, and planning
professionals have struggled to quickly develop expertise in this field. The Department
of Homeland Security has recently expressed concern over "significant weakness"
in evacuation planning. This report is intended to identify key factors needed
for reviewing evacuation readiness plans and making short and long-term improvements
on the ground. "When
America first examined the need for an Interstate Highway System, mobilization
for national defense was a key consideration. As time passed, defense mobilization
received less attention," said American Highway Users Alliance President and CEO
Greg Cohen. "In the past five years, for obvious reasons, evacuation planning
has quickly emerged as a new essential element to include in urban transportation
plans. However, as this report shows, there is significant improvement to be made."
In the new Report, only one urban area received an "A" for its evacuation capability
- Kansas City. Columbus, Memphis, and Pittsburgh each received a "B". Seven
areas were graded as a "C" and six received "D" grades. Twenty of the 37 urban
areas examined received an "F" for their evacuation abilities. The lowest scoring
areas were Detroit, Washington, DC, Phoenix, Seattle, San Diego, San Francisco-San
Jose, Miami, New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles - with Los Angeles facing the
most difficult challenge of all 37 areas. This
report is not intended to praise some cities and condemn others. Rather, it
is intended to provide a tool to assess current needs and challenges and make
changes in the future to overcome as many problems as possible. In some cases,
natural geography and population density may prevent an urban area from ever reaching
a grade of "A". But the research provides a valuable guide by which security experts
and planners can realistically evaluate existing capabilities and plan improvements
for the future. "Much
can be done today and in the coming years to provide better mobility in the event
of a sudden evacuation," said Cohen. "Additional highway capacity on exit routes
can be provided with new 'intelligent' technology, relief at traffic bottlenecks,
and the physical construction of new highway capacity; many solutions are available
to improve internal traffic flow in urban areas, and better community coordination
can improve automobile access for those who do not own their own vehicles." The
report reveals that urban areas rely heavily on private automobiles and publicly
provided highways for evacuation, as evidenced by the evacuations in New Orleans
and Houston in 2005. As a result, the capacity of roads and highways becomes the
most critical element of evacuation planning. While data shows that the vast majority
of Americans have access to automobiles, those without automobile access also
rely on highways, because buses are the most important mechanism for evacuation
for those without cars.
"I am pleased that this report identifies the need to plan for better emergency
coordination between government agencies and bus operators as well as the need
for exclusive bus routes so that operators can most efficiently exit and re-enter
cities to pick up more people quickly," said American Bus Association President
and CEO Peter Pantuso. "For
those without automobile access, over-the-road buses are extremely important in
the event of any mass evacuation. Private coaches can move very large groups of
people from a dangerous area to diverse destinations and can accommodate their
belongings without any loss of seat space."
In addition to expanded roadway capacity and automobile access, the report calls
for establishment of a national urban evacuation standards and reporting system
and for the completion of urban area evacuation plans. Evacuation
Capacity Index: Urban
Area Grades | | Rank | Urban
Area | Score | | GRADE:
A | | 1 | Kansas
City | 90.0 | | GRADE:
B | | 2 | Columbus | 82.3 | | 3 | Memphis | 80.5 | | 4 | Pittsburgh | 80.4 | | GRADE:
C | | 5 | Indianapolis | 79.2 | | 6 | Cincinnati | 79.0 | | 7 | Cleveland | 74.5 | | 8 | Orlando | 74.1 | | 9 | San
Antonio | 73.5 | | 10 | St.
Louis | 70.6 | | 11 | Dallas-Fort
Worth | 70.5 | | GRADE:
D | | 12 | New
Orleans | 67.3 | | 13 | Austin | 66.2 | | 14 | Providence | 65.9 | | 15 | Milwaukee | 65.2 | | 16 | Baltimore | 62.6 | | 17 | Sacramento | 60.3 | | GRADE:
F | | 18 | Denver | 59.8 | | 19 | Tampa-St.
Petersburg | 58.9 | | 20 | Virginia
Beach | 57.4 | | 21 | Houston | 54.8 | | 22 | Boston | 49.4 | | 23 | Philadelphia | 49.4 | | 24 | Atlanta | 48.1 | | 25 | Portland | 47.7 | | 26 | Minneapolis-St.
Paul | 47.5 | | 27 | Las
Vegas | 47.4 | | 28 | Detroit | 47.3 | | 29 | Washington | 44.9 | | 30 | Phoenix | 43.6 | | 31 | Seattle | 39.9 | | 32 | San
Diego | 37.8 | | 33 | San
Francisco-San Jose | 37.2 | | 34 | Miami | 36.9 | | 35 | New
York | 31.5 | | 36 | Chicago | 28.0 | | 37 | Los
Angeles | 25.6 |
A
copy of the full report can be found at:
www.highways.org/pdfs/evacuation_report_card2006.pdf.
# # # The
American Highway Users Alliance represents motorists, bus companies, truckers,
RV enthusiasts, motorcyclists and a broad cross-section of businesses that depend
on safe and efficient highways to transport their families, customers, employees,
and products. Highway Users members pay taxes that finance transportation spending
programs and advocate public policies that dedicate those taxes to improved highway
safety and mobility. |